3 tools, in alphabetical order (this isn't a ranking). Check each tool's commercial-use notes before you ship assets in a game.
| Tool | Free plan | Commercial use | API | MCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modl.ai | Unverified | Not applicable | Unverified | Unverified |
 nunu.ai | Free trial or credits only | Not applicable | Available | Official MCP server |
 Razer QA Companion-AI | Unverified | Not applicable | Unverified | Unverified |
AI agents that test game builds without SDK integration: upload a build, describe tests in plain language, and get bug reports with video, logs and severity scores. Supports Android and desktop today; iOS is listed as in development.
Verdict: For QA teams that want black-box automated testing of mobile or desktop builds; the site says very fast-paced gameplay isn't fully supported yet.
AI agents that play and test games on real PC and mobile devices from plain-English instructions, with session recordings, reports and an optional lightweight SDK. Console support is listed as coming soon.
Verdict: For automated playtesting on real iOS/Android/PC devices; the free Starter credits are one-time, and API/MCP access needs the $200/month plan.
Integration-free game QA tool: flags performance issues against FPS/CPU/GPU/memory thresholds, drafts bug reports from captured gameplay, links bugs to Jira and generates test cases from prompts or design documents.
Verdict: For QA teams that want AI-drafted bug reports and performance capture with Jira linking; pricing is by quote only.